블로그 이미지
세상에 떠도는 수많은 느낌과 아이디어! 같은 느낌, 비슷한 생각.... 어때요? wizysl

카테고리

전체보기 (5129)
ysl* 아이디어 (346)
ysl* 사람들 (552)
ysl* ndns 내돈내산 (134)
ysl* 맛 (278)
ysl* 건강 (34)
ysl*sports (9)
ysl* 컨텐츠 (1828)
ysl* 트래블 (543)
ysl* 랭킹 (221)
ysl* 하드웨어 (377)
ysl*mobile (316)
맥HW (93)
맥SW (198)
맥Korea (81)
ysl*admin (10)
Total
Today
Yesterday

달력

« » 2024.11
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

태그목록

최근에 올라온 글

레이저 프린터에서 나오는 토너 미세 입자가 폐에 들어가면 건강에 해가될 수 있다고 미국 화학회의 온라인 저널  Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T)에서 2007.8.1일자가 보도했다. 호주의 화학자는 62개의 레이저 프린터를 조사한 결과 그중 17개를 "입자 방출량 과다"로 판정했는데, 이는 담배를 피울 때 나오는 정도의 미세입자를 발생시킨다고.

사용자 삽입 이미지
- 레이저 토너의 전자현미경 사진. http://spacescience.spaceref.com/newhome/headlines/ast05mar98_3.htm

실내에서 담배를 못 피우게 하면서, 한쪽에서 레이저 프린터를 계속 사용하면 마찬가지라는 뜻이다. 물론 레이저 프린터를 사용하지 않을 때는 상관없는 이야기지만, 삼성 전자가 레이저 프린터를 밀어 붙이고 있는 이때에 이런 실험 결과가 나오니 혹시라도 잉크젯으로 잘나가는 경쟁회사 쪽에서 후원한 연구 혹은 이미 알고 있던 것일지 모른다는 상상도 해본다. 물론 복사기는 오존을 발생시켜 몸에 해롭다는 것을 우리는 이미 알고 있지만, 쉬쉬하며 잘 쓰고 있는 것과 마찬가지?

Contact: Michael Bernstein
m_bernstein@acs.org
202-872-4400
American Chemical Society

Particle emissions from laser printers might pose health concern

Certain laser printers used in offices and homes release tiny particles of toner-like material into the air that people can inhale deep into lungs where they may pose a health hazard, scientists are reporting. Their study is scheduled for the August 1 online issue of the American Chemical Society’s Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T), a semi-monthly journal.

Lidia Morawska, Ph.D., and colleagues in Australia classified 17 out of 62 printers in the study as “high particle emitters” because they released such elevated quantities of particles, which the researchers believe to be toner, the ultrafine powder used in laser printers instead of ink to form text and images. One of the printers released particles into an experimental chamber at a rate comparable to the particle emissions from cigarette smoking, the report stated.

Thirty-seven of the 62 printers, on the other hand, released no particles that diminished air quality. Six released only low levels, and 2 medium levels. All printers were monitored in an open office, and the researchers recorded data on three laser printers in an experimental chamber. The study included popular models in the U. S. and Australia sold internationally under the Canon, HP Color Laserjet, Ricoh and Toshiba brand names.

Most of the printer-generated particles detected were ultrafine, Morawska said, explaining that such contaminants are easily inhaled into the smallest passageways of the lungs where they could pose “a significant health threat.” Previous studies have focused on emissions of volatile organic compounds, ozone, and toner particles from office printers and copiers. However, the research left broad gaps in scientific understanding of particle emissions and airborne concentrations of particles, the report noted.

Morawska and colleagues, who are with the Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, initially were not trying to close that knowledge gap. “It wasn’t an area that we consciously decided to study,” Morawska said in an interview. “We came across it by chance. Initially we were studying the efficiency of ventilation systems to protect office settings from outdoor air pollutants. We soon realized that we were seeing air pollution originating indoors, from laser printers.”

The study found that indoor particle levels in the office air increased fivefold during work hours due to printer use. Printers emitted more particles when operating with new toner cartridges, and when printing graphics and images that require greater quantities of toner.

Funded by Queensland Department of Public Works and The Cooperative Research Centre for Construction Innovation, the ES&T report includes a list of the brands and models in the study classified by amount of particles emitted. As a result of the study, the scientists are calling on government officials to consider regulating emission levels from laser printers. “By all means, this is an important indoor source of pollution,” Morawska said. “There should be regulations.”

The health effects from inhaled ultrafine particles depend on particle composition, but the results can range from respiratory irritation to more severe illnesses, such as cardiovascular problems or cancer, Morawska said. “Even very small concentrations can be related to health hazards,” she said. “Where the concentrations are significantly elevated means there is potentially a considerable hazard.”

Larger particles also could be unhealthy without reaching the deepest parts of the lung. “Because they are larger,” Morawska added, “they contain more mass and can carry more toxins into the body. No matter how you look at it, there could be problems.”

Morawska said that more research on the health effects of inhaling printer-generated particles is needed. As a first step to lower risk, people should ensure that rooms in offices or houses are well ventilated to allow airborne particles to disperse.

###

The American Chemical Society-the world’s largest scientific society-is a non-profit organization chartered by the U.S. Congress and a global leader in providing access to chemistry-related research through its multiple databases, peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. Its main offices are in Washington D.C., and Columbus, Ohio.

Posted by wizysl
, |

최근에 달린 댓글

최근에 받은 트랙백

글 보관함